| ||||
|
It's in the news all over the place - the Philadelphia Inquirer and other newspapers, PBS, NPR, CNN, Fox News, Channel 17 News. In his "Chemical Security Act of 2003" (S167), Senator Corzine (D, NJ) wants to require that all chemical plants consider it. And, if you build a plant in Contra Costa County, California, there is already a local ordinance that requires an evaluation of inherently safer technology. But, what does it really mean? Is inherent safety really the magic bullet for eliminating chemical risks that some advocates seem to think? The presentation will focus on understanding what inherently safer design really means, clarifying some misconceptions about its meaning, and talking about what is going on in the regulatory and legislative arenas especially in regards to chemical processes.
"Green Chemistry"
has become a major focus for development of new chemical products and
manufacturing processes. While emphasis has generally been placed on
environmental issues, inherent product and process plant safety are important
components of the "Green Chemistry" concept. Inherent Safety is discussed in
the Special Supplement of the January 2002 Chemical Engineering Progress
entitled "An Evolution in Chemical Engineering: The Journey Ahead". The section
"Refocusing Chemical Engineering" outlines that whether a facility is a large
chemical commodity plant that must be operated efficiently to make a profit, or
a batch scale specialty chemical (pharmaceuticals, electronic materials, biotech
products) plant that must be first to the marketplace for profitability;
"Inherently Safer Design" improves cost effectiveness and can be considered in
on-going plant process improvements. The five (5) approaches for inherently
safer plants include: |
|
Pay
Local Dues (click for information) [Top of Page] [Home] [AIChE National]
For comments, suggestions, and questions regarding this
web site |